J.E.Vanaja

Mikähän trikki tämä on? Tai sitten, että mikä toi noitten hävittäjien kanssa lentävä coisa on? Mielenkiintoinen juttu.

OVNI escoltado por aviones jet en MSN Video

Ignordcoown

We are the Partnership States 99% of the people, woolrich parka but that the countryside was controlled away 1% of the people." From Protection Way spread to tons countries in Europe and America "career" activities, "99% of 1% of the declared campaign" has adorn come of a crucial Aspect. Americans in the finished seems difficult with the "hatred of the dear" is linked, as they be experiencing every time admired Bill? Gates, Steve Jobs talent and insoluble work beside so "the dough" people of excellence, but the pecuniary disaster three years ago, the immeasurable majority of U.S. enough of the people simply "1%" of the fiscal giants, lubricator billionaire, corporate executives and past the "revolving door" between administration and on the sly walk in the inside class. Claiming "99%" of Americans are irksome to beat it invest in rule in the "1%" in the hands of mighty political and remunerative voice. This "craft" activities, the America's richest and most miserly and the mid class and the "grassroots" the discontinuity between unreservedly revealed, allows people to espy, you as a "superpower" of the Allied States is bogged down in "nationalistic dilemma." Faced with a growing caste subdivide and intensified span of the "class expend energy", but what the U.S. authority as? Different views of Democrats and Republicans if people would just be a party to b manipulate bickering, and take no panacea, then, essentially, to further their political and economic process, people on the shortcomings of nationwide frustration.
99% to 1% of the avowal of cross swords
From mid-September, the "appointment of Barricade High road" drive has spread to closely anyone hundred cities in the Cooperative States, Britain and other European countries has also been echoed. Some people hold that this is a no leaders, no medial demands, there is no free decipherment for the unspecific sign, but watchful impression can be found difference between rich and poor people are most dissatisfied, the most pertinent slogans such as "against the greed of unfettered companies, against corruption "and" denial U.S. politicians only safe keeping nearby the group's interests, "" condemned the pecuniary giants to buy with money civil affairs "," to regain U.S. influence in the civil and remunerative decision-making "," assessment the rich "and so on. Protesters are game to submit: "We are the Collective States 99% of the denizens, but the state was that 1% of control." Demonstrators in Seattle on the site says: "The no greater than aspect we contain in common is: we 99% of friendship, no longer willing to stick the 1% of the stinginess and corruption. "In Washington," the occupation of Washington "push spokesman Greg? Fuyi Xi stressed:" We come to disagreement, because the In agreement States monumental companies and generous financial institutions are in supervise of our sway, discharge c emit the government subtract orders from them, and not in regard to general disreputable services. "
Participate in "Brick up Avenue occupation" activities Protesters also held up, "We are 99%," the slogan came to Modern York Manhattan Fifth Avenue, president of Scoop Corp. Murdoch, JP Morgan Follow CEO Jamie woolrich? Dumont, bulky oil wheeler-dealer Wei? Koch and assorted other billionaires substantiation in leading of the apartment. According to the U.S. "Forbes" website lists America's richest oil wheeler-dealer's expectations catalogue, the top two of the Charles? Koch and David? Koch brothers were $ 17.5 billion and $ 14 billion in assets, they and other The discretion of fuel tycoon basically 60 years of age.
"Most of the protesters are young, they are losing the time to express the voice of a generation." "New York Times' editorial seems to attired in b be committed to 9 immature people would like to emphasize a significance of loss. The editorial said that the money-making economic downturn continues to a mark on the midway class, while the redolent cause got it together. People throughout protests to convey a message: return partiality in the mid-point descent is being tortured, and expanded the pinched, American polite society may be a "at hand the facility and willingness to work, but it did not chore, who constitute the underclass."
"Appropriation of Barrier High road" stump is as a matter of fact from the Canadian anti-consumerism publication "Adbusters" a question selection. The ammunition columnist Cali? Larsen stressed that the U.S. 1% of the fecund in to enjoy a giant amount of dividends, burden breaks, while the remaining 99% of the people to engender unemployment, extinction of assets and other pressure, ignorant later so that they side with exposed in protest. According to U.S. media reports, America's richest 1% of the complete family income more than 20% of income is the highest point of 80 years, this figure in the news 1970s was 10%. American economist Joseph? Stiglitz be in control of algorithm is that America's richest 1% of people away each year less 25% of perfect returns, its cornucopia is accounted for 40% of unalloyed store, which 25 years ago the figures were 12% and 33%. Matter divulge that access to America's richest 1% of the stratum is the annual profits verge of more than 380,000 U.S. dollars. Egalitarian strategist Maria? Kaduo Na said the current wages of U.S. subject executives five times higher than in 1980, while the average American artisan's so so compensation is the 1980's; American CEO's commonplace annual receipts is $ 11 million , while the general staff an as a rule of only $ 40,000.
U.S. populace has more than 300 million mark, according to 1% is roughly 300 million people. Correspondingly, the U.S. Census Bureau information released in September 2010, the U.S. poverty valuation of 15.1%, with 4620 million unfruitful people, in the service of the 52-year high. According to statistics, the ongoing U.S. unemployment evaluate was 9.1%, unemployment is 14 million. American John? Hopkins University, "the financial crisis and banking emend, case studies," visiting bookworm at the Sorbonne School of Economics Dr. Jin Rongxue Zhao rose mould two years has been emerging sexually transmitted issues in Europe and America to study. He received the "Worldwide Times" lady of the fourth estate, said that some countries will also be profits of the culmination 5% of the folk as the area's richest people, while the profits of the lowest 5% of the denizens as the most ruined people. "Occupation of Infuriate Street" activities related to the 1% and 99% of the difficulty, not so much a real hundred, as it is illusory, but it illustrates the proximate American upper crust in the "post-crisis times" monstrous disparity.
?In addition to the affluence void, the 1% in the Coordinated States have special meaning. Stiglitz made it not guilty that wealth brings power to achieve more wealth. According to him, all the U.S. Senate and Dwelling-place of Representatives in the nomination when the number already bound to to the richest 1%, followed through 1% from these levels depend on the pelf to amass their jobs; they positive if the servicing is good that 1%, After leaving Congress, want be 1% of the pay on the side of this. In joining, the might administrative portion in the exchange and economic rule makers are basically from that 1%. According to U.S. media reports, the model to leave the 120 members of Congress, the existing 39 in the promote for the industry; 328 Mingaobama superintendence officials help of the "revolving door" into the institution's senior; over the good old days ten years a total of 5400 Congressional sceptre associate oneself with lobbying organization. Stiglitz wrote in May of this year: "America's richest 1% of people procure the best habitation, superlative tutoring, the foremost doctors and the most appropriate freedom of life, but there appears to be the despite the fact money can not accept: that is, to be aware of their fortune and the other 99% of people live how closely related in story, this is the richest 1% of the fixed had to understand things. but too late. "
"Class try" to conceal the nature of the two parties the having said that
British "The Bold" talking "situation of Fortification Passage" race, said that the American people gripe that the Collective States has unendingly respected unfettered capitalism, but now this approach can no longer be taken for granted, more and more Americans are definitely informed of the collective unfolding of axiom trespass occurred, they questioned the mercantile arrangement is no longer equal to the fruit prearranged to the community. This leaves the U.S. halfway point arrange children are in disheartenment because "the original group acquire no longer applies."
Zhao L, told reporters, "occupied the Irritate Road" race that included the American centre league after the first epoch to his "necessitous", they are directed at the 1% of the ruling pedigree and simple, to some, "control on" flavor. Selected as the objective of 1% of this game, there is naturally a substantiate, "attracting eyeballs" need succour to triumph in available sympathy. In the U.S., there are commentators that Americans do not indicate on their own over-consumption and over-borrowing obstreperous, "declared war on the 1% does not interpret the tough nut to crack, the need is from excel to bottom together to coins behavior." University of York, UK economist Bo Weike also told the "Pandemic Times" reporter, in fact, austerely criticized the high-income groups is not adjust the financial Urban district of London concerning high-income employees in the UK "contributions" to a huge amount of revenues octroi taxes.
As a service to street protesters blame, Murdoch and other tycoons chose the door closed, but some possess also been disc 1% level. In Chicago, so protesters smarting that the CBOT was posted on the windows of the building, "We are 1%" catchword, is obviously a "we are 99%" a mockery of the slogan. American economist, "The Brand-new York Times" columnist Paul? Krugman recently wrote that although it is unclear, "the job of Palisade Street" activities pleasure change America's management, but has steer to the Wall Drive super-rich and amenities in the richest 1% of the savoir vivre interests of politicians and experts of the "deeply uncontrollable reaction", showing that these systems from being manipulated to benefit a flagrant person to espy through the panic.
To whatever manner, there are the opulent type in the "rebels", "Warren" Buffett on August 14 in "The Stylish York Times" wrote an article entitled "Block spoiling the super-rich." U.S. President Barack Obama has accepted his proposed annual income of over $ 1 million tax raise people's recommendations. Another "rebel rich" is a in britain artistry of "1%", "born abundant" and other documentaries to the property split between the Synergetic States Jamie? Johnson, he is the fifth generation of Johnson & Johnson heir. Johnson revealed that America's richest 1% just heed about insulting affluence, do not attention around others and the social, economic dip only means on the side of them, best dotty at diminish cost.
"99%" of the "1%" declaration of take up arms, the "year strife" in American media on the spur of the moment befit the "buzzword." Concourse to be called the Republican "populace" is made between American opposition. Democrats are eager to associate themselves with the "irate grassroots" identify with, and tried to incline the protesters Egalitarian Festivity is their spokesperson. Tactics ideas from the main view, the Republican advocates of small ministry, enormous call, against taxes, President Bush capitally tender it, he said: "Look at my debouchure embody in words --- not tribute increases." Democrats are more uneasy vulnerable groups, with labor unions move one's bowels relatively close. Be that as it may, the U.S. electoral civics and scratch, gold Peer completely linked, and multifarious Americans credence in that the two parties are essentially the spokesman in support of the interests of big companies. Buffalo came from Washington to participate in protests counselors Alison? Shiwen Qi Le, "Worldwide Times" reporter, said: "The U.S. is not ruled through the people, but after rotund companies dominated the Republican and Democratic Defendant represents the interests of large companies, both during the compete contributions they received in the main companies, the two parties are essentially the same. "
Inequality is a hackneyed pretty pickle worldwide
In Australia, Melbourne, protesters shouted: "We all had plenty to above a few chartered classes." In the UK, "occupied the London Stock Altercation," the scheme said: "We should prefer to had enough. Bankers entertain not been punished , while the people of this country but because they caused a turning-point and be punished. "They also lay out from at 16:00 on October 15th to December 12, occupation of London's economic province of Paternoster Square. "The Independent" 10 said the growing wait between productive of and impoverished Britain's problems from the 2008 monetary emergency, has not narrowed, but in lieu of more and more serious. Britain in 2010, Federal Bureau of Statistics study create that Britain's richest 10 percent of households accounted on 44% of the provinces's private wealth.
Bo Weike York University economist, told reporters: "'field of Protection Roadway' activities described in the Agreed States and Europe, the disruption between invaluable and poor has transform into a popular cancer, if nothing is done, cancer cells purpose go on to spread." Bo Weike that In times of pecuniary prosperity, although the unfettered mass of matter executives high salaries, but it last will and testament not induce to out of the closet enrage, because we maintain that at best depend on the brawn of the principal frugality in called-for to engender advance to their own lives. But when the money-making emergency does not wear off ancillary to when the put, so it is cast aside earnings system. He suggested that these vocation executives should contemplate more of the Stomach Ages, London Mayor Whittington's popular saying: "of course can be wonderful, but to pass on you more valuable."
In regard to the Connected States is intensifying societal contradictions, Japan's "Yomiuri Shimbun" talk recently said, "traditional pecuniary risks than their ruined accessible moaning, most sexual workers norm people groaning with ass effort more notable of the highest political decision-makers active about." "Asahi Shimbun" claimed that the American people scarcity the unvarying as spin "require be sent to the gallows billionaire and monetary tycoon." Also commented that "sexual be reluctant voracity, cunning and fall short of of liability 1% of the extraordinarily person." In actuality, the cause of Japan, rapid cost-effective progress in the era of the last century, Japan had to "100 million the reckon mid-stream" and self-importance, but modern the rich-poor dole out Japanese way of life bit by bit worse. Wherefore, "Japanese Cost-effective Low-down" commented that, in Japan there are also their own "Enrage fail Road hot", the monetary cash of the "sortilege ripple" to conceive a different group of high-income earners, saying that they are exploiters of social profusion may not fair, but in items they do catch a too appreciable popular majesty, resources and expectations.
Can not beat it that the wide-ranging gap of property is a stock problem. Zhao L that in some developing countries, the disparity is much higher than some developed countries, in truth, the Western developed countries, developing countries silent procure many things merit learning. On example, he said, France compared with other Western countries by the pecuniary crisis relatively starlight, because France has a relatively sound communal confidence scheme, for the sake low-income excise preferential policies, plus the Command's economic and banking method of meticulous supervision.

J.E.Vanaja

Laws of thermodynamics

The four laws of thermodynamics summarize the most important facts of thermodynamics. They define fundamental physical quantities, such as temperature, energy, and entropy, to describe thermodynamic systems and they describe the transfer of energy as heat and work in thermodynamic processes. Experimentally reproducible distinction between heat and work is at the heart of thermodynamics, and about processes in which this distinction cannot be made, thermodynamics has nothing to say.
The four principles, or laws, of thermodynamics are:
The zeroth law of thermodynamics recognizes that if two systems are in thermal equilibrium with a third, they are also in thermal equilibrium with each other, thus supporting the notions of temperature and heat.
The first law of thermodynamics distinguishes between two kinds of physical process, namely energy transfer as work, and energy transfer as heat. It tells how this shows the existence of a mathematical quantity called the internal energy of a system. The internal energy obeys the principle of conservation of energy but work and heat are not defined as separately conserved quantities. Equivalently, the first law of thermodynamics states that perpetual motion machines of the first kind are impossible.
The second law of thermodynamics distinguishes between reversible and irreversible physical processes. It tells how this shows the existence of a mathematical quantity called the entropy of a system, and thus it expresses the irreversibility of actual physical processes by the statement that the entropy of an isolated macroscopic system never decreases. Equivalently, perpetual motion machines of the second kind are impossible.
The third law of thermodynamics concerns the entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero temperature, and implies that it is impossible to cool a system to exactly absolute zero, or, equivalently, that perpetual motion machines of the third kind are impossible.
Classical thermodynamics describes the exchange of work and heat between systems. It has a special interest in systems that are individually in states of thermodynamic equilibrium. Thermodynamic equilibrium is a condition of systems which are adequately described by only macroscopic variables. Every physical system, however, when microscopically examined, shows apparently random microscopic statistical fluctuations in its thermodynamic variables of state (entropy, temperature, pressure, etc.). These microscopic fluctuations are negligible for systems which are nearly in thermodynamic equilibrium and which are only macroscopically examined. They become important, however, for systems which are nearly in thermodynamic equilibrium when they are microscopically examined, and, exceptionally, for macroscopically examined systems that are in critical states[8], and for macroscopically examined systems that are far from thermodynamic equilibrium.
There have been suggestions of additional laws, but none of them achieve the generality of the four accepted laws, and they are not mentioned in standard textbooks.
The laws of thermodynamics are important fundamental laws in physics and they are applicable in other natural sciences.

The zeroth law of thermodynamics may be stated as follows:
If system A and system B are in thermal equilibrium with system C, then system A is in thermal equilibrium with system B
The zeroth law implies that thermal equilibrium, viewed as a binary relation, is a Euclidean relation. If we assume that the binary relationship is also reflexive, then it follows that thermal equilibrium is an equivalence relation. Equivalence relations are also transitive and symmetric. The symmetric relationship allows one to speak of two systems being "in thermal equilibrium with each other", which gives rise to a simpler statement of the zeroth law:
If two systems are in thermal equilibrium with a third, they are in thermal equilibrium with each other
However, this statement requires the implicit assumption of both symmetry and reflexivity, rather than reflexivity alone.
The law is also a statement about measurability. To this effect the law allows the establishment of an empirical parameter, the temperature, as a property of a system such that systems in equilibrium with each other have the same temperature. The notion of transitivity permits a system, for example a gas thermometer, to be used as a device to measure the temperature of another system.
Although the concept of thermodynamic equilibrium is fundamental to thermodynamics, the need to state it explicitly as a law was not widely perceived until Fowler and Planck stated it in the 1930s, long after the first, second, and third law were already widely understood and recognized. Hence it was numbered the zeroth law. The importance of the law as a foundation to the earlier laws is that it allows the definition of temperature in a non-circular way without reference to entropy, its conjugate variable.

First law
The first law of thermodynamics may be expressed by several forms of the fundamental thermodynamic relation:
Increase in internal energy of a system = heat supplied to the system + work done on the system

For a thermodynamic cycle the net heat supplied to the system equals the net work done by the system.
The net change in internal energy is the energy that flows in as heat minus the energy that flows out as the work that the system performs on its environment. Work and heat are not defined as separately conserved quantities; they refer only to processes of exchange of energy.
These statements entail that the internal energy obeys the principle of conservation of energy. The principle of conservation of energy may be stated in several ways:
Energy can be neither created nor destroyed. It can only change forms.
In any process in an isolated system, the total energy remains the same.

Second law

The second law of thermodynamics asserts the existence of a quantity called the entropy of a system and further states that
When two isolated systems in separate but nearby regions of space, each in thermodynamic equilibrium in itself (but not necessarily in equilibrium with each other at first) are at some time allowed to interact, breaking the isolation that separates the two systems, allowing them to exchange matter or energy, they will eventually reach a mutual thermodynamic equilibrium. The sum of the entropies of the initial, isolated systems is less than or equal to the entropy of the final combination of exchanging systems. In the process of reaching a new thermodynamic equilibrium, total entropy has increased, or at least has not decreased.
It follows that the entropy of an isolated macroscopic system never decreases. The second law states that spontaneous natural processes increase entropy overall, or in another formulation that heat can spontaneously be conducted or radiated only from a higher-temperature region to a lower-temperature region, but not the other way around.
The second law refers to a wide variety of processes, reversible and irreversible. Its main import is to tell about irreversibility.
The prime example of irreversibility is in the transfer of heat by conduction or radiation. It was known long before the discovery of the notion of entropy that when two bodies of different temperatures are connected with each other by purely thermal connection, conductive or radiative, then heat always flows from the hotter body to the colder one. This fact is part of the basic idea of heat, and is related also to the so-called zeroth law, though the textbooks' statements of the zeroth law are usually reticent about that, because they have been influenced by Carathéodory's basing his axiomatics on the law of conservation of energy and trying to make heat seem a theoretically derivative concept instead of an axiomatically accepted one. Šilahvý (1997) notes that Carathéodory's approach does not work for the description of irreversible processes that involve both heat conduction and conversion of kinetic energy into internal energy by viscosity (which is another prime example of irreversibility), because "the mechanical power and the rate of heating are not expressible as differential forms in the 'external parameters'".
The second law tells also about kinds of irreversibility other than heat transfer, and the notion of entropy is needed to provide that wider scope of the law.
According to the second law of thermodynamics, in a reversible heat transfer, an element of heat transferred, δQ, is the product of the temperature (T), both of the system and of the source or destination of the heat, with the increment (dS) of the system's conjugate variable, its entropy (S)

The second law defines entropy, which may be viewed not only as a macroscopic variable of classical thermodynamics, but may also be viewed as a measure of deficiency of physical information about the microscopic details of the motion and configuration of the system, given only predictable experimental reproducibility of bulk or macroscopic behavior as specified by macroscopic variables that allow the distinction to be made between heat and work. More exactly, the law asserts that for two given macroscopically specified states of a system, there is a quantity called the difference of entropy between them. The entropy difference tells how much additional microscopic physical information is needed to specify one of the macroscopically specified states, given the macroscopic specification of the other, which is often a conveniently chosen reference state. It is often convenient to presuppose the reference state and not to explicitly state it. A final condition of a natural process always contains microscopically specifiable effects which are not fully and exactly predictable from the macroscopic specification of the initial condition of the process. This is why entropy increases in natural processes. The entropy increase tells how much extra microscopic information is needed to tell the final macroscopically specified state from the initial macroscopically specified state.

Third law
The third law of thermodynamics is usually stated as follows:
The entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero is exactly equal to zero.
This is explained in statistical mechanics by the fact that a perfect crystal has only one possible microstate (microscopic state) at extremely low temperatures: The locations and energies of every atom in a crystal are known and fixed. (In quantum mechanics, the location of each atom is not exactly fixed, but the wavefunction of each atom is fixed in the unique ground state for its position in the crystal.) Entropy is related to the number of possible microstates, and with only one microstate, the entropy is exactly zero.
The third law is also stated in a form that includes non-crystal systems, such as glasses:
As temperature approaches absolute zero, the entropy of a system approaches a minimum.
The minimum, not necessarily zero, is called the residual entropy of the system.

See also: Philosophy of thermal and statistical physics
In about 1797, Count Rumford (born Benjamin Thompson) showed that mechanical action can generate indefinitely large amounts of heat, so challenging the caloric theory. The historically first established thermodynamic principle which eventually became the second law of thermodynamics was formulated by Sadi Carnot during 1824. By 1860, as formalized in the works of those such as Rudolf Clausius and William Thomson, two established principles of thermodynamics had evolved, the first principle and the second principle, later restated as thermodynamic laws. By 1873, for example, thermodynamicist Josiah Willard Gibbs, in his memoir Graphical Methods in the Thermodynamics of Fluids, clearly stated the first two absolute laws of thermodynamics. Some textbooks throughout the 20th century have numbered the laws differently. In some fields removed from chemistry, the second law was considered to deal with the efficiency of heat engines only, whereas what was called the third law dealt with entropy increases. Directly defining zero points for entropy calculations was not considered to be a law. Gradually, this separation was combined into the second law and the modern third law was widely adopted.